chore(release): prepare v0.1.0 release for main #16
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: Template for new ADRs
|
||||||
|
description: "One-sentence summary of the decision."
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* **Status:** Proposed
|
||||||
|
* **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
|
||||||
|
* **Decision Makers:** LUNA Charts Maintainers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Describe the background that led to this decision.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Questions that should be answered:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* What problem needs to be solved?
|
||||||
|
* Which architectural constraints exist?
|
||||||
|
* Which project goals influence the decision?
|
||||||
|
* Which stakeholders are affected?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision Drivers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
List the primary factors that influenced the decision.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Typical examples:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Accessibility
|
||||||
|
* Performance
|
||||||
|
* Developer Experience
|
||||||
|
* Maintainability
|
||||||
|
* Framework Agnosticism
|
||||||
|
* Type Safety
|
||||||
|
* Simplicity
|
||||||
|
* Scalability
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Considered Alternatives
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Document all relevant alternatives.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Alternative | Description |
|
||||||
|
| ----------- | ----------- |
|
||||||
|
| Option A | Description |
|
||||||
|
| Option B | Description |
|
||||||
|
| Option C | Description |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Briefly explain why the alternatives were not selected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Decision
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Describe the selected solution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This section should clearly answer:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> What has been decided?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Rationale
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Explain why the selected solution best satisfies the decision drivers.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This section should justify the decision from an architectural perspective.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Consequences
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Positive
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Describe the expected benefits.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Examples:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Improved maintainability
|
||||||
|
* Better accessibility
|
||||||
|
* Easier onboarding
|
||||||
|
* Reduced complexity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Negative
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Describe possible drawbacks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Examples:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Increased implementation effort
|
||||||
|
* Additional maintenance
|
||||||
|
* Performance trade-offs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Related TOGAF Phases
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
List all architecture phases that influenced this decision.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Examples:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Architecture Vision (Phase A)
|
||||||
|
* Technology Architecture (Phase D)
|
||||||
|
* Implementation Governance (Phase G)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## References
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Provide references to related documentation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Examples:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Architecture Wiki
|
||||||
|
* Other ADRs
|
||||||
|
* External standards
|
||||||
|
* Specifications
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user